About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-270966 1 (1996-05-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaebv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision



Matter of: Dimensions International/QSOFT, Inc.

File:        B-270966; B-270966.2

Date:        May 28, 1996

J. Patrick McMahon, Esq., and Thomas K. David, Esq., McMahon & David, for the
protester.
James Y. Miyazawa, Esq., Department of Navy, for the agency.
Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Agency properly rejected protester's proposal where its responses to sample tasks
designed to determine the offeror's understanding of and the technical approach to
satisfying the government's requirements were unacceptable.
DECISION

Dimensions International/QSOFT, Inc. protests the rejection of its proposal under
request for proposals (RFP) No. N00600-95-R-1461, a total small business set-aside,
issued by the Department of the Navy, for automatic data processing services at the
Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center, Patuxent, Maryland, under a fixed-price
contract for a base year with four 1-year options.

We deny the protest.

The RFP provided for award to be made to the offeror whose proposal represented
the best value, price and other factors considered. The RFP requested prices for a
variety of designated labor categories and informed offerors that cost/price would
be evaluated for realism. Technical proposals were to be evaluated under the
following criteria listed in descending order of importance: (1) technical approach,
(2) key personnel, (3) management plan, and (4) corporate experience. Under
technical approach, the proposal preparation instructions required each offeror to
provide detailed responses to eight sample tasks, which were said to be
representative of the work to be performed under the contract. For each sample
task, the offeror's response was to include (1) a description of possible areas to be
investigated, (2) a detailed technical approach and detailed step-by-step procedures,
(3) identification of additional information that would be required to perform the
task, (4) a detailed work plan for implementation, (5) a product outline describing
what would be the expected deliverable(s) and/or results of the task, and


1140524

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most