About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-270706.2 1 (1996-06-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaeao0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Comptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision Matter of: The Arora Group, Inc. File: B-270706.2 Date: June 18, 1996 Sudhir Arora for the protester. Thomas J. Duffy, Esq., and Daria H. Rusyn, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Proposed award to the offeror with the highest technical evaluation score is unobjectionable where record establishes that technical evaluation of proposals was done in accordance with the evaluation criteria and agency reasonably concluded that there were significant distinctions between the protester's and proposed awardee's relevant experience which led the agency to rate the proposed awardee higher under that category. DECISION The Arora Group, Inc. protests the selection of Dr. Isis Hannallah for award of a contract under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAHC35-95-R-0010, issued by the Department of the Army for radiology services. Arora alleges flaws in the agency's evaluation of both its own and Hannallah's proposals, specifically referencing certain advantages associated with its radiologists' subspecialty and post graduate training. We deny the protest. Issued as a total small business set-aside, the RFP sought proposals for two full- time radiologists to provide diagnostic radiology services at DeWitt Army Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The services will include diagnostic interpretation of radiologic examinations, diagnostic consultation related to diagnostic imaging, and the full range of routine diagnostic and therapeutic work performed by a board certified diagnostic radiologist. The RFP anticipated the award of a fixed-price contract for a base period with four 1-year options. Award was to be made to the offeror whose proposal was most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered. Technical merit was considered 1113612

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most