About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-270697 1 (1996-04-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaeai0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision



Matter of: Potomac Research International, Inc.

File:       B-270697; B-270697.2

Date:       April 9, 1996

Kenneth S. Kramer, Esq., James M. Weitzel, Esq., and James S. Kennell, Esq., Fried,
Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, for the protester.
James J. Durney, for COBRO Corporation, an intervenor
Joshua A. Kranzberg, Esq., David H. Scott, Esq., and William R. Hinchman, Esq.,
Department of the Army, for the agency.
Linda S. Lebowitz, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Where the agency properly determined that the awardee's initial proposal was
technically acceptable and that its proposed cost was reasonable, and where the
agency reserved the right to award on the basis of initial proposals without
discussions, the award to the lower proposed cost, technically equal offeror was
reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.
DECISION

Potomac Research International, Inc. (PRI) protests the award of a contract to
COBRO Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAD05-95-R-0018,
issued by the Department of the Army for data collection services for the U.S. Army
Aviation Technical Test Center, Ft. Rucker, Alabama. The protester challenges the
technical acceptability of COBRO's proposal, the reasonableness of COBRO's
proposed cost, and the agency's decision to award on the basis of initial proposals
without discussions.

We deny the protest.

The RFP contemplated the award of a time-and-materials, cost-reimbursement
contract for a base period with 4 option years. For each period of performance, the
RFP schedule listed estimated hours for specified personnel positions. Offerors
were required to insert on the schedule unit and extended hourly rates for each
position (some of which were subject to applicable wage determinations). The RFP
described required and desired education, experience, and skills qualifications for


93948

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most