About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-270499.6 1 (1996-08-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadzc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Comptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision Matter of: Schleicher Community Corrections Center, Inc.--Reconsideration File: B-270499.6 Date: August 15, 1996 Kent C. Dugmore, Esq., Parsons, Behle & Latimer, for the protester. Aldo A. Benejam, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Request for reconsideration is denied where protester does not show that prior decision denying its protest contained any errors of fact or law or present information not previously considered that warrants reversal or modification of our decision. DECISION Schleicher Community Corrections Center, Inc. (SCCC) requests that we reconsider our decision in Schleicher Community Corrections Center, Inc., B-270499.3 et al., Apr. 18, 1996, 96-1 CPD 192, in which we denied SCCC's protest of the award of a contract to Cornell Corrections of California, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. 200-256-W. The RFP was issued by the Federal Bureau of Prisons for residential community corrections services. SCCC argued that the agency improperly evaluated its proposal with respect to the facility it offered and failed to conduct meaningful discussions with SCCC. In its request for reconsideration, SCCC contends that our decision contains errors warranting reversal. We deny the request for reconsideration. The RFP contemplated the award of a requirements-type, indefinite-delivery contract, for a 12-month base period, with up to three 1-year option periods. Section M of the RFP listed the following evaluation factors in descending order of relative importance (subfactors within each factor are shown in parenthesis): technical (reports/policy/procedure; facility; overall programs approach); cost; and management (personnel and staffing; experience and structure). Award was to be made to the offeror whose proposal was determined to be in the best interest of the government. 419815

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most