About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-270012.3 1 (1996-04-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadvw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Comptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE A protected decision was issued on the date below and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This version has been redacted or approved by the parties involved for public release. Matter of. Ogden Support Services, Inc. File: B-270012.3 Date: April 24, 1996 Ronald K. Henry, Esq., and Mark A. Riordan, Esq., Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, for the protester. Dennis J. Riley, Esq., and Joseph G. Billings, Esq., for Riley & Artabane, an intervenor. Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that agency intends to preserve the contract award in implementing the recommendations made in a prior General Accounting Office decision sustaining the protester's challenge to the award is dismissed as premature. 2. Request for reconsideration of the remedy, recommended in a prior General Accounting Office decision sustaining the requester's protest is denied because it is based on the erroneous premise that the prior decision found that the requester's proposal represented a lower cost than the awardee's proposal, when, in fact, the prior decision found the awardee's proposal represented the lower evaluated cost. DECISION Ogden Support Services, Inc. protests the corrective action that may be undertaken by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Office of Information Technology, pursuant to our decision in Ogden Support Servs., Inc., B-270012.2, Mar. 19, 1996, 96-1 CPD 177, which sustained Ogden's protest against the award of a contract to American Systems Corporation (ASC) under request for proposals (RFP) No. 95-W001, for mail and courier support services. Additionally, the protester requests clarification/reconsideration of the remedy recommended in the prior decision. We dismiss the protest because it merely anticipates improper action that has not yet taken place and deny the request for reconsideration because it provides no basis for reconsidering our prior decision. 245627

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most