About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-261953.5 1 (1996-02-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadri0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






' ITV'


1210227


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                       REDACTED DECISION
                                         A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                         and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                         version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                         involved for public release..


Matter of: Cessna Aircraft Company

File:        B-261953.5

Date:        February 5, 1996

Terrence O'Donnell, Esq., Ari S. Zymelman, Esq., and Kevin M. Hodges, Esq.,
Williams & Connolly; and John S. Pachter, Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., and
Christina M. Pirrello, Esq., Smith, Pachter, McWhorter & D'Ambrosio, for the
protester.
Gerard F. Doyle, Esq., Ron R. Hutchinson, Esq., Scott A. Ford, Esq., Alexander T.
Bakos, Esq., and Scott W. Woehr, Esq., Doyle & Bachman; and Steven A. Kaufman,
Esq., Clayton S. Marsh, Esq., and James M. Lichtman, Esq., Ropes & Gray, for Beech
Aircraft Corporation, the interested party.
Gregory H. Petkoff, Esq., Duncan Butts, Esq., Jeffrey Watson, Esq., Janice Beckett,
Esq., Mark Otto, Esq., and Robert McGrath, Esq., for the agency.
Aldo A. Benejam, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protester's contention that agency improperly evaluated proposals is denied
where the record shows that the agency evaluated in accordance with the criteria
announced in the solicitation, and the record reasonably supports the evaluators'
conclusions.

2. Allegation that the agency's source selection advisory council (SSAC) improperly
changed the source selection evaluation board's (SSEB) rating of protester's
proposal for trainer aircraft under the system safety evaluation factor from blue
(exceptional) to green (acceptable) is denied, where the record shows that the
SSEB's rating was primarily based on the protester's twin-engine design, and,
despite a specific request from the SSAC, the SSEB could not convince the SSAC
that a twin-engine design resulted in a safer aircraft.

3. Contracting agency reasonably evaluated protester's performance risk based
upon unfavorable information in contractor performance assessment reports and
in responses to questionnaires reflecting the protester's recent poor performance on
other contracts.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most