About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-258139.5 1 (1996-02-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadpi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Comptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision DECISION FOR PUBLIC RELEASE A protected decision was issued on the date below and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This version has been redacted or approved by the parties involved for public release. Matter of: Energy and Environmental Services Corporation--Reconsideration File: B-258139.5 Date: February 26, 1996 Jay W. Maynard, Esq., for the protester. John Van Schaik, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Request for reconsideration based on original decision's failure to address protester's argument that contracting agency failed to perform cost realism analysis of awardee's proposal, as required by Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) § 215.801, is denied; while original decision did not set forth and directly address the requirements of DFARS § 215.801, the decision did address and deny protester's numerous allegations that, in contravention of DFARS § 215.801, the agency failed to determine if awardee's proposed costs for environmental services were (1) realistic for the work to be performed, (2) demonstrated that awardee understood the requirements of the solicitation, and (3) were consistent with its technical approach. DECISION Energy and Environmental Services Corporation (EES) requests reconsideration of our decision Energy and Envtl. Servs. Cor., B-258139.4, May 15, 1995, 95-2 CPD 32, in which we denied EES' protest against the award of a contract to ASCR Contracting Company, Inc. (ACCI) under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAADO1- 93-R-0046, issued by the Department of the Army for the acquisition of caretaker and environmental services for the U.S. Army Jefferson Proving Ground. We deny the request. The RFP contemplated the award of a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract and advised offerors that the contract would be awarded on the basis of the best value to the government and that the government would be willing to pay more for a superior technical/management proposal. The solicitation also informed offerors that the government intended to award the contract without holding discussions. 93442

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most