About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-261367.2 1 (1995-11-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaccb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision


Matter of: Sociometrics, Incorporated

File:        B-261367.2; B-261367.3

Date:        November 1, 1995

Paralee White, Esq., Laurel Hockey, Esq., and Joseph A. Zillo, Esq., Cohen & White,
for the protester.
Nicholas P. Retson, Esq., and Bryant S. Banes, Esq., Department of the Army, for
the agency.
Joel R. Feidelman, Esq., Deneen J. Melander, Esq., and Lawrence E. Ruggiero, Esq.,
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, for Science Applications International
Corporation, an interested party.
Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. In procurement for personal services, where awardee's proposal received high
ratings for its recruitment plan, alleged changes in awardee's proposed level of
effort for recruiting did not require agency to downgrade awardee's proposal, where
changes merely represented the deletion of direct labor hours which duplicated
indirect hours already included, and which remained in the proposal.

2. In contract for personal services in which level of effort was set at time of
award, agency cost realism evaluation reasonably was focused primarily on
comparison of proposed labor rates of offerors.

3. Where protester's proposal was rated technically excellent, agency advised the
protester of some, but not all, weaknesses in its initial proposal, and protester's
responses in its best and final offer resulted in a higher technical score, the agency
met its responsibility to conduct meaningful discussions; agency was not required to
identify all elements of the proposal which received less than full evaluation credit.

4. Agency record sufficiently documented cost realism analysis and source
selection decision which found that proposals were technically equivalent, thus
making low cost the determining factor for award.


1056111

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most