About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419445 Mar 04, 2021 1 (2021-03-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaecqb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                    1O     o    U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
                                A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
                                           approved for public release.


Matter of:   Omni2Max

File:        B-419445

Date:        March 4, 2021

Wayne  A. Keup, Esq., Wayne A. Keup, PLLC, for the protester.
Robert Young, Esq., and Jeffrey Davenport, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the
agency.
Michael Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging protester's exclusion from competition is denied where the
solicitation required evidence of legally enforceable agreements, and the protester did
not provide such evidence.
DECISION

Omni2Max,  a small business of La Mesa, California, protests its exclusion from
competition under solicitation No. N32205-18-R-4041 issued by the Department of the
Navy, Military Sealift Command, for the charter of a vessel to support a towed array
sensor system. The  protester alleges that the agency unreasonably excluded its
proposal from the competition for failing to demonstrate that Omni2Max possessed the
requisite legal interest in the vessel it proposed, per the terms of the solicitation.

We  deny the protest.

BACKGROUND

The agency  issued the request for proposals (RFP) on June 16, 2020, seeking to
charter a vessel for a period of up to four years and eleven months. Memorandum of
Law  (MOL) at 1. The solicitation provided that award would be made to the lowest-
priced, technically acceptable offeror considering the following evaluation factors:
(1) critical submission data; (2) technical; (3) past performance; and (4) price. Agency
Report (AR), Tab 4, Request for Proposals (RFP) at 54. Relevant to this protest,
concerning the critical submission data evaluation factor, the solicitation required
offerors to certify that they: (1) owned the proposed vessel; (2) were the bareboat

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most