About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419109.3,B-419109.4 1 (2021-01-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaecly0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Dynamic Systems  Technology, Inc.

File:     B-419109.3; B-419109.4

Date:     January 21,   2021

James  M. White, Esq., Marshall & White, PLLC, for the protester.
Kenneth C. Gilliland, Esq., and Wade L. Brown, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
agency.
Jacob M. Talcott, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the agency's decision to take corrective action is denied where
agency reasonably identified and corrected a latent ambiguity in the solicitation.

2. Protest challenging agency's limitation on revisions following an amendment is
denied where the protester did not suffer any competitive prejudice.

3. Protest alleging that the agency might evaluate proposal contrary to terms of
solicitation is dismissed as premature where the agency has not reevaluated proposals.
DECISION

Dynamic  Systems Technology, Inc. (DysTech), a small business of Fairfax, Virginia,
protests the decision of the agency to take corrective action under request for proposals
(RFP) W15QKN-20-R-0055, issued   by the Department of the Army, for recovery care
coordinator support services for the Department of the Air Force. The protester
contends that the agency's decision to take corrective action was unreasonable. The
protester also contends that the agency's limitation on revisions following its
amendment   to the solicitation was unreasonable.

We  deny the protest.

BACKGROUND

On  May 7, 2020, the Army issued the RFP, in accordance with Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) part 16, as a small business set-aside to all prime contractors holding

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most