About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418266.4,B-418266.7 1 (2020-10-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaebyc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAiOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Connected  Global Solutions, LLC

File:        B-418266.4; B-418266.7

Date:     October 21,   2020

James  Y. Boland, Esq., Emily A. Unnasch, Esq., Christopher G. Griesedieck, Esq., and
Taylor A. Hillman, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Tracye Winfrey Howard, Esq., Brian G. Walsh, Esq., Samantha
S. Lee, Esq., Cara L. Lasley, Esq., Lindy C. Bathurst, Esq., and Adam R. Briscoe, Esq.,
Wiley Rein LLP, for American Roll-on Roll-off Carrier Group Inc., the intervenor.
Erika L. Whelan Retta, Esq., and Jason Smith, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for
the agency.
Kenneth  Kilgour, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the contracting officer's affirmative determination of the
awardee's responsibility is sustained where the record shows that the awardee's
statements offered in the course of a second responsibility determination--that two
affiliates implicated in criminal wrongdoing would not contribute to contract
performance--contradicted the awardee's technical capability proposal.

2. Protest that the agency conducted unequal discussions regarding technical
capability proposals is denied where the record does not support the protester's
contention that discussions with the awardee unfairly focused on the technical proposal
while discussions with the protester focused on price.

3. Protest that agency failed to adequately document oral presentations and the related
discussions is sustained where the record demonstrates that the agency did not
maintain a record of the oral presentations adequate to permit meaningful review.

4. Protest challenging the agency's conduct of discussions regarding oral presentations
is sustained when the record does not provide a basis for finding that the discussions
were fair.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most