About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417748.6,B-417748.7,B-417748.8 1 (2020-08-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaebtm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          1been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Kord Technologies, Inc.

File:        B-417748.6; B-417748.7; B-417748.8

Date:        August 11, 2020

Robert J. Wagman Jr., Esq., Joshua R. Robichaud, Esq., and Ryan M. Eletto, Esq.,
Bracewell LLP, for the protester.
Major Mark T. Robinson, Brian Chapuran, Esq., and Robert B. Neill, Esq., Department
of the Army, for the agency.
John Sorrenti, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency failed to assess multiple strengths to protester's proposal, while
unreasonably assessing five weaknesses, is denied where the record shows that the
evaluation was reasonable.

2. Protest that agency should not have evaluated skill mix under a particular technical
evaluation factor is denied where the solicitation stated that under this particular
evaluation factor, the agency would evaluate the offerors' total resource volumes, which
included the proposed skill mix.

3. Protest that agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions is untimely because
protester had all the information it needed to raise this allegation in its initial protest but
did not.

4. Protest that the agency unreasonably evaluated cost realism is denied where
protester is unable to demonstrate that the evaluation resulted in competitive prejudice.

5. Protest that the solicitation should be canceled or amended because the agency's
needs have changed is denied where the agency affirmatively states that its needs have
not changed and protester has not provided any evidence to refute this statement.
DECISION

Kord Technologies, Inc. (Kord), of Huntsville, Alabama, protests its exclusion from the
competitive range by the Department of Defense, Missile Defense Agency (MDA),

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most