About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-418500.2,B-418500.3,B-418500.4,B-418500.5 1 (2020-07-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaebob0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          1been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Solers Inc., a Peraton Company

File:        B-418500.2; B-418500.3; B-418500.4; B-418500.5

Date:        July 31, 2020

Kevin P. Connelly, Esq., Kelly E. Buroker, Esq., Jeffrey M. Lowry, Esq., Kirsten W.
Konar, Esq., and Tamara Droubi, Esq., Vedder Price PC, for the protester.
Gary J. Campbell, Esq., G. Matthew Koehl, Esq., and Lidiya Kurin, Esq., Womble Bond
Dickinson (US) LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., the intervenor.
Colleen A. Eagan, Esq., and Vera A. Strebel, Esq., Defense Information Systems
Agency, for the agency.
Charmaine A. Stevenson, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency failed to give adequate consideration to significant organizational
conflicts of interest, based on an alleged business partnership between the awardee
and the company providing personnel to serve as non-government advisors, is denied
where the agency's investigation was reasonable, and where the protester's assertions
fail to present hard facts indicating the existence of an impermissible conflict.

2. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of proposals as unreasonable and disparate,
and challenge to the source selection decision, are denied where the record shows that
the evaluation and selection decision were fair, reasonable, and consistent with the
terms of the solicitation.
DECISION

Solers Inc., a Peraton Company, of Arlington, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task
order to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., of McLean, Virginia, under request for proposals
(RFP) No. 831812879, issued by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), for
support services for DISA's Development and Business Center, Business Cyber
Development Directorate. The protester contends that the Booz Allen proposal contains
an unmitigated organizational conflict of interest (OCI) and should have been deemed
ineligible for award. The protester also contends that the agency's evaluation is
unreasonable and disparate, and as a result, the selection decision is flawed.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most