About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417935,B-417935.2,B-417935.3 1 (2019-12-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeazg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States



Decision                                    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                          a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approved for public release.
Matter of:  Raytheon Company

File:       B-417935; B-417935.2; B-417935.3

Date:        December 13, 2019

Kevin P. Connelly, Esq., Kelly Buroker, Esq., Kirsten Konar, Esq., and Tamara Droubi,
Esq., Vedder Price PC, for the protester.
Marcia G. Madsen, Esq., David F. Dowd, Esq., Luke Levasseur, Esq., Mayer Brown
LLP, for Lockheed Martin Corporation, the intervenor.
Per David Midboe, Esq., J. Gregory Lennon, Esq., Kelsey A. Harrer, Esq., Department
of the Navy, for the agency.
Lois Hanshaw, Esq., and Amy B. Pereira, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging agency's evaluation of proposals and source selection decision is
denied where the record shows that the agency's evaluation and selection decision
were reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.
DECISION

Raytheon Company, of Portsmouth, Rhode Island, protests the award of a contract to
Lockheed Martin Corporation, of Moorestown, New Jersey, under request for proposals
(RFP) No. N00024-17-R-5152, issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Sea
Systems Command, for a ship self-defense system (SSDS) to develop, integrate, and
maintain a combat management system for aircraft carriers, large deck amphibious
ships, and future surface ship classes. The protester argues that the agency improperly
evaluated technical and cost proposals.

We deny the protest.

BACKGROUND

The RFP, issued on August 4, 2017, using procedures of Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) part 15, contemplated the award of a single contract with cost-plus-
incentive-fee (CPIF), CPIF level-of-effort (LOE), and fixed-price contract line item

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most