About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-414342.2,B-414342.3,B-414342.4 1 (2019-02-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvol0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                    Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                              DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                            The decision issued on the date below wassubjectto
Decision                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          D been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Hope Village, Inc.

File:        B-414342.2; B-414342.3; B-414342.4

Date:        February 21,2019

Christopher R. Yukins, Esq., Kristen E. Ittig, Esq., Michael E. Samuels, Esq.,
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, for the protester.
Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Mary Pat Buckenmeyer, Esq., and Zachary D. Prince, Esq.,
Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, for CORE DC, LLC, an intervenor.
William Robinson, Esq., Catherine Scott, Esq., and Nihar Vora, Esq., Department of
Justice, for the agency.
Young H. Cho, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of protester's proposal as unacceptable
under technical/management factor and conduct of discussions is denied where the
record provides no basis on which to conclude that discussions were not meaningful
and where the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the
solicitation.

2. Protest arguing awardee failed to provide sufficient proof of right to use the proposed
facility as required by the solicitation is sustained where the awardee provided a letter of
intent, which was not listed as a form of acceptable evidence of right to use, and the
record contains no indication that the agency assessed the validity of the offeror's right
to use as required by the solicitation.
DECISION

Hope Village, Inc., of Washington, DC, protests the award of a contract to CORE DC,
LLC, of Washington, DC, under request for proposals (RFP) No. RFP-200-1270-ES,
issued by the Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), for residential re-entry
center (RRC) and home confinement services. The protester, which is the incumbent
contractor for the requirement, challenges the evaluation of the proposals, conduct of
discussions, source selection decision, and the agency's responsibility determination.


We sustain the protest in part and deny the protest in part.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most