About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-414672.4,B-414672.7 1 (2018-10-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadveq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States


                                                DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                              The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                              been approved for public release.

Matter of:   Novetta, Inc.

File:     B-414672.4; B-414672.7

Date:     October 9, 2018

Scott F. Lane, Esq., Katherine S. Nucci, Esq., and Jayna M. Rust, Esq., Thompson
Coburn LLP, for the protester.
Daniel R. Forman, Esq., and Laura J. Mitchell Baker, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP,
for Vencore, Inc.; and Deneen J. Melander, Esq., Richard A. Sauber, Esq. and
Lanora C. Pettit, Esq., Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP,
and Kenneth M. Reiss, Esq., Northrop Grumman Corporation, for Northrop Grumman
Systems Corporation, the intervenors.
Sarah L. Carroll, Esq., and Aubri Dubose, Esq., Defense Information Systems Agency,
for the agency.
Elizabeth Witwer, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the Source Selection Evaluation Board's (SSEB) rationale for
removing a strength assessed by the Technical Evaluation Board is sustained where
the SSEB's rationale is not meaningfully explained in the record.

2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation under the problem statements factor is
denied where the record shows that the agency's evaluation was reasonable, and there
is no evidence that the protester was prejudiced by any alleged evaluation errors.

3. Protest alleging that latent ambiguities in the solicitation led offerors to propose
pricing on an unequal basis is dismissed for failure to state a basis of protest where the
protester does not identify any solicitation requirements that were ambiguous or
unclear.

4. Protest challenging the agency's decision not to conduct discussions is denied
where the protester erroneously contends that certain factors must be present in
Department of Defense procurements valued over $100 million in order for an agency to
reasonably forego discussions.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most