About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-415028.3,B-415028.4 1 (2018-09-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadved0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States
                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                The decision issued on the date belowwassubject to
                                                a GAO Protective Order. Thisredacted version has
Decision                                       been approved forpublic release.



Matter of:   Sigmatech, Inc.

File:        B-415028.3; B-415028.4

Date:     September 11, 2018

Jon D. Levin, Esq., J. Dale Gipson, Esq., and Katherine E. McGuire, Esq., Maynard
Cooper & Gale, PC, for the protester.
Jerome S. Gabig, Esq., and Christopher L. Lockwood, Esq., Wilmer & Lee, P.A., for
DigiFlight, Inc., the intervenor.
Jonathan A. Hardage, Esq., Christopher C. Schwan, Esq., David Watson, Esq., and
Stacy G. Wilhite, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the evaluation of vendors' technical quotations is denied where
the evaluation was consistent with the terms of the solicitation and was otherwise
reasonable.

2. Protest alleging that the agency evaluated vendors on an unequal basis is dismissed
as untimely where the protester raised supplemental arguments more than 10 days
after receiving a detailed explanation of the agency's assessment of strengths for the
awardee's quotation.

3. Protest alleging that the award was tainted by a disqualifying conflict of interest is
denied where the agency reasonably concluded that no such conflict exists.
DECISION

Sigmatech, Inc., of Huntsville, Alabama, protests the issuance of a task order to
DigiFlight, Inc., also of Huntsville, Alabama, by the Department of the Army, Army
Materiel Command, under task order request for quotations (TORFQ) No. 2015P-06, for
support for the Security Assistance Management Directorate (SAMD). The protester
argues that the agency unreasonably and unequally evaluated the vendors' technical
quotations, failed to reasonably assess whether the awardee had a disqualifying
organizational conflict of interest (OCI), and made an unreasonable award decision.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most