About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-416542,B-416542.2 1 (2018-10-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvdu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



G     A     O       U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                    Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                               a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
Decision                                       been approved for public release.


Matter of: Technica Corporation

File:     B-416542; B-416542.2

Date:     October 5, 2018

Damien C. Specht, Esq., James A. Tucker, Esq., and R. Locke Bell, Esq., Morrison
& Foerster LLP, for the protester.
Paul F. Khoury, Esq., George E. Petel, Esq., and Nina S. Samuels, Esq., Wiley Rein
LLP, for Leidos Innovations Corporation, the intervenor.
Colonel C. Taylor Smith, and Heather M. Mandelkehr, Esq., Department of the Air
Force, for the agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the agency's justification for not providing multiple-award
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract holders a fair opportunity to be considered
for the issuance of a task order is denied where the agency reasonably concluded that
urgent circumstances did not permit the agency to conduct a competition and required
the issuance of the order on a sole-source basis.

2. Protest challenging the duration of the sole-source task order is denied where the
record shows that the duration is reasonable and consistent with the agency's estimates
for the completion of a competitive acquisition.

3. Protest that the agency failed to set aside the sole-source task order for a
competition among small businesses is denied where neither applicable regulations nor
the terms of the contract requires a set-aside, and the justification for issuing the order
without providing contract holders a fair opportunity to be considered supports the
agency's position that urgent circumstances did not allow for a competition.
DECISION

Technica Corporation, of Dulles, Virginia, a small business, protests the issuance of a
task order on a sole-source basis to Leidos Innovations Corporation, of Reston, Virginia,
by the Department of the Air Force, for support of classified and non-classified
communications for the Air Force and Department of Defense in the National Capital

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most