About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-415361,B-415361.2,B-415361.3 1 (2018-01-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaduxr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Decision The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. ..n..a......r..............d....f....r...... i.....r..e. ...a..s...e..................................................... Matter of: American Systems Corporation File: B-415361 ; B-415361.2; B-415361.3 Date: January 4, 2018 Katherine B. Burrows, Esq., Alfred M. Wurglitz, Esq., Christopher S. Denny, Esq., Nathanael D. Hartland, Esq., Laura Golden Lift, Esq., and Jeremy S. Scholtes, Esq., Miles & Stockbridge PC, for the protester. Brian P. Waagner, Esq., Hal J. Perloff, Esq., Steven A. Neeley, Esq., and Emily A. Constantine, Esq., Husch Blackwell LLP, for Jacobs Technology, Inc., the intervenor. Anthony J. Balestreri, Esq., and Mark B. Grebel, Esq., Defense Information Systems Agency, for the agency. Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and Amy B. Pereira, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of proposals is denied where the record demonstrates that the agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation. 2. The agency reasonably considered the potential for organizational conflicts of interest related to the awardee's proposal. 3. Protest challenging the agency's selection decision is denied where the record shows that the agency's best-value decision was reasonable, and the protest amounts to no more than disagreement with the agency's judgments. DECISION American Systems Corporation (ASC) of Chantilly, Virginia, protests the award of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract by the Department of Defense, Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), to Jacobs Technology, Inc., under request for proposals (RFP) No. HC1028-16-R-0007 for test, evaluation and certification services. The protester argues that the agency improperly evaluated the proposals and unreasonably made a single award. ASC also contends that the agency did not adequately consider the organizational conflicts of interest presented by the award to Jacobs.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most