About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-414331.5 1 (2017-11-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaduap0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



G     A     O       U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                       a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
                                               approved _fo-rpublic_release ...........................................................


Matter of:   Specmat Technologies, Inc.

File:        B-414331.5

Date:        November 29, 2017

Isaias Alba, IV, Esq., Julia Di Vito, Esq., Kathryn M. Kelley, Esq., and Samuel S.
Finnerty, Esq., Piliero Mazza PLLC, for the protester.
Paul F. Khoury, Esq., and George E. Petel, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for Signal
Engineering, Inc., the intervenor.
Lieutenant Colonel Kevin P. Stiens, and Jason R. Smith, Esq., Department of the Air
Force, for the agency.
K. Nicole Willems, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest of past performance evaluation is denied where the evaluation was
reasonable, consistent with the terms of the solicitation, and thoroughly documented.

2. Protest that agency failed to assess the awardee's proposal for risk following a
reduction in the awardee's proposed price is denied where the solicitation did not
require such an analysis.

3. Protest that the agency failed to conduct a price realism analysis is denied where the
solicitation contemplated the award of a contract on a fixed-price basis, the solicitation
did not contain an express price realism provision, and the solicitation lacked the types
of express statements that would support a conclusion that a price realism analysis was
contemplated.
DECISION

Specmat Technologies, Inc., located in Rockford, Tennessee, protests the award of a
contract to Signal Engineering, Inc., located in San Diego, California, under request for
proposals (RFP) No. FA8606-16-R-6397 issued by the Department of the Air Force for
personnel locator beacons (PLB). Specmat challenges the agency's evaluation of
Signal's past performance and price.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most