About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-414546 1 (2017-05-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtkd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                          of the United States




Decision


Matter of: Jay Hymas

File:       B-414546

Date:       May 23, 2017

Jay Hymas, for the protester.
Sherry Kinland Kaswell, Esq., Department of the Interior, for the agency.
Peter D. Verchinski, Esq., Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and Amy B. Pereira, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the agency's issuance of multiple cooperative farming
agreements is dismissed where the protester has already sought and received an
adjudication of the matter at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

2. Protest challenging the agency compliance with the Federal Grant and Cooperative
Agreement Act is dismissed where our Office does not review protests of the award, or
protests of solicitations for the award, of cooperative agreements because they do not
involve the award of a procurement contract, and are thus beyond our jurisdiction.
DECISION

Jay Hymas, of Richland, Washington, protests the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service's (FWS) use of cooperative farming agreements (CFA) in U.S. Fish
and Wildlife refuges for 2017. Jay Hymas argues that the CFAs should be issued as
procurement contracts because the agency is not following the proper procedures under
the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act (FGCAA), 31 U.S.C. §§ 6301-6308.
The protester also alleges that the CFAs are unlawful because the agency is not
providing proper notice of the procurements.

We dismiss the protest.

Jay Hymas' challenges to the agency's CFA program began in 2013 before the U.S.
Court of Federal Claims (COFC) and ultimately reached the Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit. See Hymas v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 466 (2014); Hymas v.
United States, 810 F.3d 1312 (2016). On January 14, 2016, the Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit issued a decision resolving the government's appeal of the 2014

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most