About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-414587,B-414587.2 1 (2017-05-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtjg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                          of the United States




Decision


Matter of: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

File:       B-414587; B-414587.2

Date:       May 11, 2017

Gregory H. Petkoff, Esq., Carrie F. Apfel, Esq., Carla J. Weiss, Esq., and Joshua A.
Violanti, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for the protester.
Andrew E. Shipley, Esq., Lee P. Curtis, Esq., Seth H. Locke, Esq., and Andrew J.
Victor, Esq., Perkins Coie LLP, and Suzette W. Derrevere, Esq., and Jade C. Toman,
Esq., for The Boeing Company, the intervenor.
Alexis J. Bernstein, Esq., and Maj. Samuel T. Miller, Department of the Air Force,
for the agency.
Elizabeth Witwer, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging the agency's award of a sole-source contract is dismissed where
the agency proposes to seek capability statements from responsible sources in order to
determine whether competition is necessary.
DECISION

General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. (GDMS) of Fairfax, Virginia, protests the
decision of the Department of the Air Force to award contract No. FA8217-17-C-0003
on a sole-source basis to The Boeing Company, Defense, Space, and Security,
of Huntington Beach, California, for the Next Generation Cryptographic Architecture on
the Combat Survivor Evader Locator (CSEL) program. The protester contends that the
Air Force failed to follow the requisite competitive bidding procedures and that the
stated justification for awarding the contract on a sole-source basis to The Boeing
Company is unreasonable. The protester also contends that the agency improperly
bundled its requirements.

We dismiss the protest as academic because the agency has notified our Office that it
intends to take corrective action. Agency Notice, Apr. 26, 2017; Agency Email
Clarification, May 2, 2017. We do not consider academic protests because to do so
would serve no useful public policy purpose. Ferris Optical, B-403012.2, B-403012.3,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most