About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-414273,B-414273.2 1 (2017-04-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtix0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States


                                                       DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Decision                                             The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
Matter of:  Fintrac Inc.

File:       B-414273; B-414273.2

Date:       April 17, 2017

David E. Fletcher, Esq., Christopher J. Kimball, Esq., and Amy S. Josselyn, Esq.,
Cooley LLP, for the protester.
Daniel R. Forman, Esq., and Charles Baek, Esq., Crowell & Moring LLP, for Abt
Associates, Inc., an intervenor.
R. Rene Dupuy, Esq., Department of State, United States Agency for International
Development, for the agency.
Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging the evaluation of proposals is denied where record shows that the
agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and
applicable statutes and regulations.
DECISION

Fintrac, Inc., of Washington, D.C., protests the award of a contract to Abt Associates, of
Bethesda, Maryland, under request for proposals (RFP) No. 442-16-000006, issued by
the Department of State, Agency for International Development (AID), for commercial
horticultural development services in Cambodia. Fintrac argues that the agency
misevaluated proposals and made an unreasonable source selection decision.

We deny the protest in part and dismiss it in part.

BACKGROUND

The RFP contemplates the award, on a best-value basis, of a cost-plus-fixed-fee type
contract for a 5-year period of performance. RFP at 2, 18. Firms were advised that the
agency would evaluate proposals considering cost and several non-cost factors. The
RFP listed five non-cost factors as follows: technical requirements (deemed equal in
importance to the remaining four non-cost evaluation factors combined); key personnel
(deemed equal in importance to the remaining three non-cost evaluation factors

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most