About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413501,B-413501.2 1 (2016-11-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadstt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548                                   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
         Decision                                    been approved for public release.


         Matter of:   Science Applications International Corporation

         File:        B-413501 ; B-413501.2

         Date:        November 9, 2016

         William L. Walsh, Jr., Esq., J. Scott Hommer, III, Esq., Miranda S. Riemer, Esq.,
         Keir X. Bancroft, Esq., and Michael T. Francel, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
         Barbara A. Duncombe, Esq., Suzanne Sumner, Esq., and Trenton A. Hamilton,
         Esq., Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, for Battelle Memorial Institute, an intervenor.
         Col. C. Taylor Smith and Heather M. Mandelkehr, Esq., Department of the
         Air Force, and Christopher E. Kernan, Esq., United States Special Operations
         Command, for the agency.
         Matthew T. Crosby, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest of agency's evaluation of technical proposals is denied where the record
         reflects the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation's terms
         and the applicable procurement statutes and regulations.

         2. Protest of agency's decision not to conduct discussions under Defense Federal
         Acquisition Regulation Supplement § 215.306(c), which provides that contracting
         officers should open discussions in procurements valued over $100 million, is
         denied where the solicitation advised the agency would make award without
         discussions if possible, and where the record shows the agency reasonably
         determined the awardee's technically superior, reasonably-priced proposal
         represented the best value to the government.
         DECISION

         Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), of McLean, Virginia, protests
         the award of a contract to Battelle Memorial Institute, of Columbus, Ohio, by the
         United States Special Operations Command under request for proposals (RFP)
         No. H92222-15-R-0037 for nonstandard commercial vehicles modified for special
         operations use. SAIC alleges that the agency's evaluation of proposals was
         unreasonable and that its decision not to conduct discussions was improper.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most