About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-413945 1 (2016-11-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadssc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Shertech Pharmacy Piedmont, LLC

         File:        B-413945

         Date:     November 7, 2016

         Timothy A. Sheriff, Esq., Sheriff & White, PLLC, for the protester.
         Evan C. Williams, Esq., and Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
         agency.
         Evan D. Wesser, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protester's interpretation of solicitation provision requiring a 30 minute response
         time for certain materials as requiring only an acknowledgment by the contractor, as
         opposed to actual delivery, is unreasonable when the solicitation is read as a whole
         and in a manner giving effect to all of its provisions; the only reasonable
         interpretation is that the contractor will be required to deliver the materials within the
         specified time period.

         2. Protest challenging the terms of the solicitation as being unduly restrictive of
         competition is dismissed as untimely where the challenge is raised after award.
         DECISION

         Shertech Pharmacy Piedmont, LLC, a small business, of Kernersville, North
         Carolina, protests the award of a contract to Cardinal Health 414, LLC, of Dublin,
         Ohio, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91YTZ-16-R-0068, which was
         issued by the Department of the Army, for the provision of radiopharmaceuticals for
         the Womack Army Medical Center at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Shertech alleges
         that the agency unreasonably found its proposal technically unacceptable as a
         consequence of a latent ambiguity regarding the solicitation's requirements, and the
         solicitation, as interpreted by the agency, was unduly restrictive of competition.


We deny the protest in part and dismiss it in part.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most