About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411987,B-411987.3 1 (2015-11-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrsr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                    been approved for public release.




         Matter of:   United Airlines, Inc.

         File:        B-411987; B-411987.3

         Date:        November 30, 2015

         Daniel R. Forman, Esq., Gerald F. Murphy, Esq., Lorraine M. Campos, Esq.,
         Marc L. Warren, Esq., James G. Peyster, Esq., and Steven J. Seiden, Esq., Crowell
         & Moring LLP, for the protester.
         Reese Davidson, Esq., Evelyn D. Sahr, Esq., Drew Derco, Esq., Edward Longosz,
         Esq., and Mark Johnston, Esq., Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, for the
         intervenor.
         Danielle K. Muenzfeld, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency.
         Cherie J. Owen, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         The General Services Administration's determination that award to a U.S. flag air
         carrier for a flight route to be performed by a foreign airline under a code-share
         agreement, where the tickets will be issued under the U.S. carrier's designator code
         and flight number, does not violate the Fly America Act, is unobjectionable under
         GSA's implementing regulations.
         DECISION

         United Airlines, Inc., of Chicago, Illinois, protests the award of a contract to JetBlue
         Airways Corporation, of Long Island City, New York, under request for proposals
         (RFP) No. QMACB-KB-150001-N, issued by the General Services Administration
         (GSA), Federal Acquisition Service, for airline passenger transportation services,
         known as the City Pair Program. United contends that JetBlue's proposal was
         ineligible for award because it violates various laws and failed to comply with the
         solicitation. United also contends that the agency improperly failed to conduct
         discussions and failed to sufficiently document its selection decision.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most