About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411573.2,B-411573.3 1 (2015-11-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrqp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A    O                                                   Comptroller General
A       Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548
                                                          DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                        The decision issued on the date below was subject to
           Decision                                    Ia GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                        been approved for public release.

           Matter of:   DRS Technical Services, Inc.

           File:     B-411573.2; B-411573.3

           Date:     November 9, 2015

           Neil H. O'Donnell, Esq., Lauren B. Kramer, Esq., and Jeffery M. Chiow, Esq.,
           Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC, for the protester.
           Michael F. Mason, Esq., C. Peter Dungan, Esq., Nicole D. Picard, Esq., and Stacy
           M. Hadeka, Hogan Lovells US LLP, for Lockheed Martin Integrated Services, Inc.,
           the intervenor.
           Annemarie Drazenovich, Esq., Daniel R. Wilmoth, Esq., and Debra J. Talley, Esq.,
           Department of the Army, Army Materiel Command, for the agency.
           Brent Burrs, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
           GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Protest is sustained where agency's evaluation of awardee's proposed level of
           effort was unreasonable and inconsistent with the terms of the solicitation.

           2. Although protester raises an untimely challenge to the terms of the solicitation,
           we address it on the merits under GAO's exception to its timeliness rules, as it
           raises an issue of significant interest to the procurement community. Protest of
           solicitation's evaluation scheme is sustained where it failed to account for
           differences in offerors' transition plans and effectively penalized offerors that
           proposed to provide full staffing and operational performance on the first day of the
           task order and rewarded offers that proposed a phased approach to staffing and
           performance.

           3. Agency's organizational conflict of interest (OCI) investigation was not
           reasonable as it failed to meaningfully consider whether the awardee's performance
           of a portion of the work required under the anticipated task order would result in an
           impaired objectivity OCI.
           DECISION

           DRS Technical Services, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task
           order to Lockheed Martin Integrated Services, Inc. (LMIS), of Bethesda, Maryland,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most