About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-211265 1 (1983-06-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrlu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                 UNITED STATES GENERM ACCOUN fING OFFC9i

                        WASH IC-3-TON, D C. 2OS48


or GE NERAL COUNSEL

  B-211265                                      June 28, 1983



  Stephen J. Lisante, Acting Chief
  Fiscal Management Branch
  Internal Revenue Service, S.E. Region
  Department of the Treasury
  P.O. Box 926
  Atlanta, Georgia   30301

  Dear Mr. Lisante:

       This responds to your request that Internal Revenue
  Service (IRS) cashier Darlene J. Hartley be relieved from her
  responsibility to reimburse the imprest fund for the unauthor-
  ized purchase of six air purifiers for $119.82. We grant
  relief for the reasons stated below.

       On November 19, 1961, Ms. Hartley paid a reimbursement
  voucher for six desk top purifiers, commonly called smoke
  eaters, in the amount of $119.82. The vouchers were pre-
  sented to her on a completed form 1334, Requisition for
  Services and Supplies, appropriately signed by the Chief,
  Operating Services Section and the contracting officer. All
  documents, therefore, were properly approved and signed, pur-
  suant to IRM 1724. The certifying officer, however, dis-
  allowed the payments as improper and requested Ms. Hartley to
  replenish the fund herself. The certifying officer based the
  disallowance on the pending review of a similar voucher paid
  by another IRS cashier, Marie Persinger, 61 Comp. Gen. 635
  (1982), modified, B-203553 February 22, 1983.

       This Office is authorized to relieve accountable officers
  of responsibility for an improper payment if we are able to
  find that such payment was not the result of bad faith or lack
  of due care on the part of the accountable officer. 31 U.S.C.
  S 3527(c)%(formerlv 31 U.S.C. § 82a-2). In our decision of
  February 22, 1983, suora, we held that The purchase of al air
  putifier for an em-lovee suffering from allergies was  rp;zopero
  because the device primarily conferred a personal benefit. We
  did say, however, that with no evidence of bad faith, in the
  presence of proper certification, and in light of the history
  of prior purchases of air purifiers, the cashier exercislc '
  reasonable care. The requested relief was granted to
  Ms. Persinger.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most