About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-411465,B-411465.2 1 (2015-08-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrjw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




 G             A    O                                                  Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office ........................................................................................................................
 Unsigt , Stats Gn ADOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
 Washington, DC 20548
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                     Decision                       [been aprvdfor pulcrelease.
          D ec   is io n                                                            --------------~ea



          Matter of:   DynCorp International LLC

          File:        B-411465; B-411465.2

          Date:        August 4, 2015

          Paul R. Hurst, Esq., Patrick F. Linehan, Esq., Michael J. Navarre, Esq., Anthony
          Rapa, Esq., and Peter L. Wellington, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson LLP, for the
          protester.
          Paul A. Debolt, Esq., James Y. Boland, Esq., Elizabeth Ann Buehler, Esq., Collier
          L. Johnson II, Esq., and Christina K. Scopin, Esq., Venable LLP, for Kellogg Brown
          & Root Services, Inc., the intervenor.
          CPT Kelly L. Sledgister, Michael J. Kraycinovich, Esq., and Andrew M. Telschow,
          Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Evan D. Wesser, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest challenging the agency's technical and cost realism evaluations is denied
          where, notwithstanding apparent errors, the protester fails to demonstrate
          competitive prejudice because it does not demonstrate that, but for the alleged
          errors, it would have had a substantial possibility of receiving the award.

          2. Protest alleging that the agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions by not
          informing the protester that its proposed labor hours appeared to be overstated is
          denied where the agency had no obligation to raise the matter because it did not
          find that the proposed hours were so high so as to be unreasonable, unrealistic, or
          render the protester's proposal ineligible for award.

          3. Protest challenging the agency's past performance evaluation and affirmative
          responsibility determination for failing to consider pending litigation involving the
          awardee is denied where the record demonstrates that the agency reasonably
          considered the information in accordance with the terms of the solicitation and
          applicable procurement regulations.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most