About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-409535.3 1 (2015-04-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrbk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
         D e  c i s i o n                          L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   Gaver Technologies, Inc.

         File:        B-409535.3

         Date:        April 2, 2015

         Ralph C. Thomas III, Esq., Barton, Baker, Thomas & Tolle, LLP, for the protester.
         Barbara A. Duncombe, Esq., Suzanne Sumner, Esq., and Casie E. Hollis, Esq., Taft
         Stettinius & Hollister LLP, for Peerless Technologies Corporation, the intervenor.
         James T. Mahoney, Esq., and Kaprice L. Harris, Esq., National Aeronautics and
         Space Administration, for the agency.
         Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the
         General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Agency reasonably rated protester's experience/past performance as high
         confidence, rather than very high confidence, where very highly pertinent
         experience was required for the latter rating, and protester's experience was not
         considered very highly pertinent.

         2. Agency did not improperly rely on unstated evaluation factor in finding that
         awardee had an edge under the experience/past performance factor as a result of
         its subcontractor's experience as the incumbent.

         3. Protester's objection to evaluators' amendment of their technical findings made
         in connection with their reevaluation of proposals is denied where protester fails to
         show that amended findings were unreasonable.
         DECISION

         Gaver Technologies, Inc., of Frederick, Maryland, protests the award of a contract
         to Peerless Technologies, Inc., of Fairborn, Ohio, under request for proposals (RFP)
         No. NNC13ZCH020J, issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
         (NASA) for professional, administrative, computational, and engineering (PACE)
         services for the Glenn Research Center's (GRC's) Lewis Field, in Cleveland, Ohio,
         and its associated facility, Plum Brook Station, in Sandusky, Ohio. The protester
         contends that the agency's source selection decision was flawed.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most