About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-410015,B-410015.2,B-410015.3 1 (2014-09-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqqa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A 0Comptroller General ity * Integrity * Rellability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i Decision Matter of: Walsh Construction Company II, LLC File: B-410015; B-410015.2; B-410015.3 Date: September 25, 2014 Joseph J. Dyer, Esq., Bennett D. Greenberg, Esq., and Caroline A. Keller, Esq., Seyfarth Shaw LLP, for the protester. Devon E. Hewitt, Esq., and Jeffry R. Cook, Esq., Protorae Law, PLLC, for J. Kokolakis Contracting, Inc., the intervenor. Kyle E. Chadwick, Esq., and Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that agency misevaluated protester's proposal is denied where evaluation of proposal as unacceptable under mission capability factor was reasonable and consistent with evaluation criteria in solicitation, which required protester to demonstrate a capable and flexible approach to project execution within identified time and logistical constraints, and record shows that protester's proposal failed to provide required aspects of the approach. 2. Where solicitation provided that proposal had to be acceptable under each element in order to be acceptable under mission capability factor, and agency reasonably found protester's proposal unacceptable based on weaknesses under one of three elements, protester was not prejudiced by any evaluation errors under two other elements. DECISION Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, protests the award of a contract to J. Kokolakis Contracting, Inc., of Bohemia, New York, by the Department of the Army, Mission and Installation Contracting Command-West Point, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91 1 SD-14-R-0002 for construction services at the United States Military Academy (USMA), in West Point, New York. Walsh argues that the Army misevaluated the firm's proposal as unacceptable, and therefore unreasonably awarded the contract to Kokolakis at a higher price. We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most