About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-408032,B-408032.2 1 (2013-05-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpov0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A    O                                                 Comptroller General
      AccntabI!it Inf * ReIabiLty                                   of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                   been approved for public release.
         D e c i s i o n                         L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:  Onsite Health Inc

         File:       B-408032; B-408032.2

         Date:       May 30, 2013

         Thomas 0. Mason, Esq., Christopher J. Kimball, Esq., and Francis E. Purcell Jr.,
         Esq., Cooley LLP, for the protester.
         Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Brian G. Walsh, Esq., Rachel A. Alexander, Esq., Tara L.
         Ward, Esq., and Stacie L. Gonsalves, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for Logistics Health,
         Inc., the intervenor.
         David R. Smith, Esq., Jennifer M. Hesch, Esq., and Roger K. Corman, Esq.,
         Department of Defense, TRICARE Management Activity, for the agency.
         Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protester was not treated disparately as compared to the awardee where the
         agency restored the protester's previously-excluded proposal to the competitive
         range, and provided an opportunity for meaningful discussions.

         2. A competitive advantage arising from the awardee's performance of the
         incumbent contract did not give rise to an organizational conflict of interest where
         the advantage was attributable to a normal incumbent's advantage, and not
         preferential treatment or unfair action by the agency.

         3. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of the protester's technical proposal is
         denied where protester does not demonstrate that the evaluation was based on
         unequal treatment.

         DECISION

         Onsite Health, Inc., of Arlington Virginia, protests the award of a contract to
         Logistics Health, Inc. (LHI), of La Crosse, Wisconsin, under request for proposals
         (RFP) No. HT001 1-1 2-R-0009, issued by the Department of Defense, TRICARE
         Management Activity (TMA), for Reserve Health Readiness Program services.
         Onsite argues that TMA treated the offerors unequally during discussions, failed to

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most