About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-407797,B-407797.2 1 (2013-02-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpka0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          G     A    O                                                  Comptroller General
Acc;tabilt      I nfegity ReiIbiIkty                                   of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
  Washington, DC 20548
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
           Decision                                  .beenapprovedforpubic release.



           Matter of:  Kaseman, LLC

           File:       B-407797; B-407797.2

           Date:       February 22, 2013

           David S. Cohen, Esq., John J. O'Brien, Esq., and Gabriel E. Kennon, Esq.,
           Cohen Mohr LLP, for the protester.
           Michael J. Kraycinovich, Esq., and Scott A. Johnson, Esq., Department of the Army,
           for the agency.
           Matthew T. Crosby, Esq., Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq.,
           Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Protest that agency unreasonably and unequally evaluated proposals is denied
           where record reflects that evaluation was reasonable and consistent with
           solicitation's evaluation criteria and that differences in evaluation did not result from
           unequal treatment.
           DECISION

           Kaseman, LLC, of McLean, Virginia, protests the elimination of its proposal from the
           competitive range under request for proposals (RFP) No. W52P1 J-1 1 -R-0068,
           issued by the Department of the Army, for services in support of the agency's
           Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP). Kaseman argues that the
           agency's evaluation of its proposal was unreasonable and that the agency treated
           the offerors unequally.

           We deny the protest.

           BACKGROUND

           The solicitation, which was issued on June 15, 2012, contemplated the award of a
           single indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract with fixed-price and cost-plus-
           fixed-fee contract line items, and with a base period of one year and two 1-year
           option periods. RFP at 2. The solicitation stated that award would be made to the
           offeror whose proposal was determined to represent the best value to the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most