About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-407778.2 1 (2013-01-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpgy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O Comptroller General Acc A omta bi lty inegity ReIIbity of the United States United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 Decision Matter of: SOS International, Ltd. File: B-407778.2 Date: January 9, 2013 Kevin C. Dwyer, Esq., and Ethan E. Marsh, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for the protester. Capt. Anthony V. Lenze, Department of the Army, for the agency. Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest challenging the agency's corrective action, which involves the reevaluation of offerors' proposals, is dismissed as premature where the protester merely anticipates improper, prejudicial agency action. DECISION SOS International, Ltd. (SOSi), of Reston, Virginia, protests the corrective action being taken by the Department of the Army in connection with the agency's procurement of intelligence technical support services for the U.S. Army Europe area of responsibility under request for proposals (RFP) No. W564KV-12-R-0015. SOSi argues that the proposed corrective action is inadequate to address all aspects of an earlier protest it filed with our Office. We dismiss the protest. The RFP contemplated the award of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) type contract with a mobilization/phase-in period, a 12-month base period, and two 6-month option periods. The solicitation established three evaluation criteria-- technical, past performance, and price--and stated that award was to be made on a lowest-price, technically-acceptable basis. The Army received and evaluated proposals from offerors, including SOSi and Six3 Intelligence Solutions, Inc., and ultimately selected the proposal submitted by Six3 for award. SOSi filed a protest with our Office challenging the propriety of the contract award to Six3. SOSi argued that the Army's evaluation of offerors' proposals under the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most