About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405292.3 1 (2012-07-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoxq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A     0                                                  Comptroller General
_Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                                of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

                                                      The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
           Decision                                  [ap roved for public release.



           Matter of:   Planned Systems International, Inc.

           File:        B-405292.3

           Date:        July 10, 2012

           Christian B. Nagel, Esq., Fluet Huber & Hoang, PLLC, for the protester.
           Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq., Joelle E.K. Laszlo, Esq., and Leigh T. Hansson, Esq.,
           Reed Smith LLP, for Luke & Associates, an intervenor.
           Behn M. Kelly, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
           Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
           GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Agency reasonably evaluated offerors' fixed prices by performing comparisons of
           proposed individual labor rates and total evaluated prices, consistent with the
           Federal Acquisition Regulation and the provisions of the solicitation, and was not
           required to consider protester's historic pricing in performing the evaluation.

           2. Protester's assertion that it should have received the highest possible past
           performance rating will not be considered where protester's evaluated price was
           more than 19 percent higher than that of the highest-priced awardee, and the
           solicitation expressly provided that the agency would pay no greater than a
           10 percent price premium for a proposal with the highest past performance rating.

           3. Where, after initially announcing contract awards, the agency corrected the past
           performance rating of another offeror, leading to an additional award to that offeror
           on the basis if its second-lowest price, the agency was not required to further
           expand the pool of awardees to include the protester's highest-priced proposal.
           DECISION

           Planned Systems International, Inc. (PSI), of Columbia, Maryland, protests the
           Department of the Air Force's decision not to award a contract to PSI pursuant to
           request for proposals (RFP) No. FA8053-1 1 -R-0001 to provide medical advisory
           and assistance services. PSI asserts that the agency's source selection decision
           reflected various flaws, including the agency's alleged failure to properly evaluate
           proposals with regard to price and past performance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most