About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-403874.2 1 (2011-01-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoxn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
LAccountability * Integrity * Reliability                               of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Lulus Ostrich Ranch

          File:        B-403874.2

          Date:        January 13, 2011

          William R. Hayward for the protester.
          Tina M. Pixler, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency did not mislead offeror to increase its price during discussions by asking the
          protester to confirm whether its prices for certain contract line item numbers were
          in error, and that it understood the requirements, since its pricing for these items
          was low as compared to the agency's historical price information.
          DECISION

          Lulus Ostrich Ranch, of San Marcos, Texas, protests the award of a contract to
          Immediate Supply General Trading Co., of Hawally, Kuwait, under request for
          proposals (RFP) No. W52P1J-10-R-0199, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S.
          Army Materiel Command, for pallet cleaning and repair services. The protester
          contends that during discussions with the agency it was misled to increase what
          otherwise would have been the winning price.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP contemplated the award of an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity
          fixed-price contract for a base year and four 1-year options. Pursuant to the RFP,
          award was to be made to the offeror that submitted the lowest priced technically
          acceptable proposal.' RFP at 2. Offerors were required to propose separate prices
          for contract line item numbers (CLIN) listed in the RFP's price schedule and the RFP
          advised that the agency would evaluate offerors' prices by adding all CLIN prices for

          ' The RFP established the following technical evaluation factors: technical
          capability, quality control plan, management plan, and transition plan. RFP at 36.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most