About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-406625 1 (2012-07-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoxk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A    O0                                                  Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                                  of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548



           Decision


           Matter of:   EMR, Inc.

           File:        B-406625

           Date:        July 17, 2012

           Michael Gross, EMR, Inc., for the protester.
           Greg Harding, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
           Frank Maguire, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
           GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Protest that agency improperly coerced protester to raise its labor rates and overall
           price, by advising during discussions that specific labor rates appeared to be low in
           relation to other offerors, and represented a weakness, is denied where information
           provided by agency was accurate, protester was specifically advised to either verify
           the proposed rates or provide revised rates, and record indicates that protester's
           decision to raise its labor rates was a business decision, not compelled by the
           agency.
           DECISION

           EMR, Inc., of Lawrence, Kansas, protests the Department of the Air Force's failure
           to award it a contract under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA6643-1 1 -R-0003, for
           the Command-wide O&M Program Execution Contract (COMPEC II) program, for
           construction and engineering services at Air Force activities. EMR asserts that the
           agency's evaluation of its labor rates was inconsistent with the RFP's statement that
           the evaluation of price would be based upon total price. EMR also arpues that the
           agency improperly coerced it during discussions into raising its price.


           1 EMR proceeded with its protest pro se and therefore did not have an attorney who
           could obtain access to nonpublic information pursuant to the terms of a protective
           order. Accordingly, our discussion of the facts of this protest is necessarily general
           in nature to avoid reference to nonpublic information. Our conclusions, however,
           are based on our review of the entire record, including nonpublic information.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most