About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-403713.6 1 (2011-06-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadotk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



I      QA                                                                 Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                       a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                       been approved for public release.
                                                       L  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i
          Decision

          Matter of:   MicroTechnologies, LLC

          File:        B-403713.6

          Date:        June 9, 2011

          Timothy Sullivan, Esq., and Katherine S. Nucci, Esq., Thompson Coburn, LLP, for
          the protester.
          Robert A. Russo, Esq., Frank V. DiNicola, Esq., Desiree A. DiCorcia, Esq.,
          Department of Veteran's Affairs, for the agency.
          Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that agency used unstated evaluation criteria in evaluating offerors,
          responses to sample task orders is denied where agency consideration of whether
          responses addressed the specific tasks necessary for successful performance of the
          overall sample tasks was reasonably related to the stated evaluation criteria for
          understanding of the problems regarding, and feasibility of approach to, the sample
          tasks.
          DECISION

          MicroTechnologies, LLC (Microtech), of Vienna, Virginia, protests the elimination
          from the competitive range of the proposal it submitted in response to the
          Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) request for proposals (RFP) No. VA-1 18-10-
          RP-0052, for information technology (IT) services. Microtech asserts that the
          agency misevaluated its proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          The solicitation provided for award of up to 15 contracts on a best value basis
          considering the following factors: technical (with subfactors for sample task orders
          (STO) and management), past performance, veterans involvement, small business
          participation commitment, and price. RFP § M.2.A. The agency received more than
          90 proposals, including 1 from Microtech. Microtech's proposal, with an evaluated
          price of $ 7.952 billion, was rated acceptable for the technical factor and each
          subfactor, low risk for past performance, acceptable for small business participation,
          and full credit for veterans involvement. VA determined that Microtech's proposal

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most