About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405163.2,B-405163.3,B-405163.4,B-405163.5 1 (2012-01-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoon0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



I      QA                                                                Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                      been approved for public release.
                                                      L  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i
          Decision

          Matter of:   QinetiQ North America, Inc.

          File:        B-405163.2; B-405163.3; B-405163.4; B-405163.5

          Date:        January 25, 2012

          J. Scott Hommer, III, Esq., Paul A. Debolt, Esq., Brendan M. Lill, Esq., and George
          W. Wyatt, IV, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
          Richard J. Conway, Esq., Michael J. Slattery, Esq., and Jade C. Totman, Esq.,
          Dickstein Shapiro LLP, for Qbase-McNeil Integrated Solutions, RLLP, the intervenor.
          Brett T. Egusa, Esq., and John T. Kirsch, Esq., Department of Homeland Security,
          for the agency.
          Pedro E. Briones, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest based on an alleged violation of the Procurement Integrity Act is denied,
          where, consistent with Federal Acquisition Regulation requirements, the agency
          investigated the alleged disclosure of protester's employees' resumes to the
          awardee by a protester's former employee (who the awardee proposed and hired as
          a key contract personnel) and found no evidence of the alleged disclosure or any
          impact on the procurement and where protester has not shown that it was
          competitively disadvantaged.

          2. Protest of an agency's technical and price evaluations is denied where the record
          shows that the agency reasonably evaluated proposals consistent with the
          evaluation criteria, extensively documenting qualitative differences between the
          protester's and awardee's proposals.

          3. Protest that an agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions and misled the
          protester is denied, where the agency informed the protester in numerous rounds of
          discussions of its evaluated deficiencies and weaknesses and did not mislead the
          protester.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most