About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-404498,B-404498.2 1 (2011-02-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadooe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



I     QA                                                                 Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                      been approved for public release.
                                                    L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i
          Decision

          Matter of:   IBM Global Business Services

          File:        B-404498; B-404498.2

          Date:        February 23, 2011

          Thomas P. Humphrey, Esq., John E. McMarthy, Jr., Esq., Puja Satiani, Esq.,
          Jonathan M. Baker, Esq., James G. Peyster, Esq., and Sarah Gleich, Esq.,
          Crowell & Moring LLP, for the protester.
          Robert J. Symon, Esq., and Lewis P. Rhodes, Esq., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings,
          LLP, for Jacobs Technology, Inc., an intervenor.
          Maj. C. Peter Dugan, Maj. John C. Dohn II, Department of the Army; and
          Craig S. McCaa, Esq., and Gregg Sharp, Esq., U.S. Special Operations Commnand,
          for the agency.
          Scott H. Riback, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest that agency evaluated proposals using an unstated evaluation
          consideration is sustained where record shows that agency gave awardee (but not
          protester) evaluation credit for proposing to achieve full operating capability (FOC)
          on an accelerated basis, but the solicitation neither defined FOC nor included a
          schedule for achieving it.

          2. Protest that agency used service desk quantity estimates for price evaluation
          purposes that differed significantly from the maximum quantities outlined in the
          solicitation is sustained; a procuring agency must provide sufficient information in a
          solicitation so that offerors can compete intelligently and on a relatively equal basis.
          DECISION

          IBM Global Business Services, of Bethesda, Maryland, protests the award of a
          contract to Jacobs Technology, Inc., of Tampa, Florida, under request for proposals
          (RFP) No. H92222-10-R-0014, issued by the U.S. Special Operations Command
          (USSOCOM), for information technology service management (ITSM) services. IBM
          asserts that the agency misevaluated proposals and that Jacobs has impermissible
          organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most