About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405251,B-405251.2,B-405251.3 1 (2011-10-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoii0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   i

G              A     0                                                 Comptroller General
     Accuntabiity * Integrity * Reliability                             of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office        DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
 Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.
          D  e c i s i o n                          ......................................................................................................................


          Matter of: Vizada Inc.

          File:        B-405251; B-405251.2; B-405251.3

          Date:        October 5, 2011

          Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr., Esq., James G. Peyster, Esq., and Adelicia R. Cliffe, Esq.,
          Crowell & Moring LLP, for the protester.
          Michael R. Charness, Esq., Jamie F. Tabb, Esq., and Christine N. Roushdy, Esq.,
          Vinson & Elkins LLP, for Stratos Government Services, Inc., an intervenor.
          Isaac Johnson, Jr., Esq., Department of Homeland Security, for the agency.
          Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency reasonably found significantly lower-priced proposal of awardee to be
          realistic.

          2. Protest that agency improperly failed to find the awardee's proposal technically
          unacceptable for not complying with various material specification requirements is
          denied, where the record shows that the agency reasonably determined that the
          proposal was acceptable.

          3. Protest that awardee's proposal contained a material misrepresentation is denied
          where there is no convincing evidence of a misrepresentation.

          4. Agency was not required to advise an offeror during discussions of proposal
          weaknesses that were reasonably not considered significant, even when the
          weaknesses were noted as a discriminating factor in making the award.
          DECISION

          Vizada Inc., of Rockville, Maryland, protests the award of a contract to Stratos
          Government Services, Inc., of Washington, D.C., under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. HSCG79-10-R-T10001, issued by the Department of Homeland Security, United
          States Coast Guard, for a Ku-band maritime data communications system to support
          the Coast Guard's large cutter fleet. Vizada contends that the agency unreasonably
          evaluated the proposals and failed to conduct meaningful discussions.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most