About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-405323.2,B-405323.3 1 (2011-10-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadohq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: J G A Comptroller General Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENTFoR-PUBICRELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: KMS Solutions, LLC File: B-405323.2; B-405323.3 Date: October 6, 2011 Joseph P. Hornyak, Esq., Terry L. Elling, Esq., Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq., and Jacob W. Scott, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for the protester. Craig A. Holman, Esq., William S. Speros, Esq., Stuart W. Turner, Esq., and Emma V. Broomfield, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, for Mission Essential Personnel, LLC; W. Jay DeVecchio, Esq., Kevin C. Dwyer, Esq., Ethan E. Marsh, Esq., Kristen M. Rogers, Esq., and Marina K. Jenkins, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for L-3 Services, Inc.; and Sean D. Forbes, Esq., and Bryant S. Banes, Esq., Neel Hooper, & Banes, PC, for Linc Government Services, LLC, the intervenors. Lt. Col. Patrick L. Vergona, and Capt. Joon K. Hong, Department of the Army, for the agency. Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. In evaluating protester's proposal under the most-heavily-weighted management evaluation factor, the agency reasonably determined that protester's proposal contained multiple errors and omissions that reflected a lack of understanding or an approach that could not be expected to meet the solicitation's requirements. 2. Based on its consideration of a Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit performed in 2010, and the protester's specific non-concurrence with various DCAA criticisms regarding protester's cost accounting system, the procuring agency reasonably determined that protester's accounting system was inadequate for award of a cost-reimbursement contract. DECISION KMS Solutions, LLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, protests the Department of the Army's rejection of KMS's proposal submitted in response to request for proposals (RFP) No. W91 1 W4-1 1 -R-0003 for the Department of Defense Language Interpretation and Translation Enterprise (DLITE) procurement. KMS challenges the agency's determination that KMS's proposal was unacceptable.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most