About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405240 1 (2011-09-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadogn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



J         G    A                                                         Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENTFoR-PUBICRELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                      been approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:   Sparkle Warner Joint Venture, LLC

          File:        B-405240

          Date:        September 27, 2011

          Carolyn Callaway, Esq., for the protester.
          Robert W. Schlattman, General Services Administration, for the agency.
          Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Scott H. Riback, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that agency improperly evaluated proposal using undisclosed criteria is
          denied, where all matters were clearly encompassed by solicitation evaluation
          provisions.
          DECISION

          Sparkle Warner Joint Venture (SWJV) LLC, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, protests
          the award of a contract to Alcazar Trades, Inc. (ATI), of San Antonio, Texas, under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. GS-08P-1 1 -JA-C-0009 issued by the General
          Services Administration (GSA) for janitorial services at the Denver Federal Center in
          Lakewood, Colorado. SWJV challenges the agency's evaluation of its proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP contemplated the award of a contract, on a best value basis for a base
          year, with 4 option years. Proposals, which were limited to eight pages, were to be
          evaluated under four factors, listed in descending order of importance--past
          performance, experience, management controls, and price. Together, non-price
          factors were considered slightly more important than price.

          Twenty-two offerors, including SWJV and ATI, submitted proposals which were
          evaluated by a source selection evaluation board (SSEB). SWJV's and ATI's
          proposals received the same ratings under the past performance factor (very good)
          and the experience factor (excellent). Under the management controls factor, ATI's
          proposal was rated excellent, while SWJV's proposal was rated satisfactory based on
          the following evaluation:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most