About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-247196 1 (1992-04-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoaw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1

      /omp ro Uer General                                        1-
              of the United ShameVAL'4j
              WkJngto. D, 2064

              Decision


              Matter of:     Dr. James A. Majeski--Restoration of
                              forfeited annual leave.

              File:          B-247196

              Date:          April 13, 1992

              DIGEST

              An employee failed to use restored forfeited leave within
              the required 2-year period and the leave again was
              forfeited, Although the employee alleges that the agency
              erred in advising him regarding the rules for using.'restored
              leave, the leave may not be restored again. The 2-year
              requirement, which is contained in a regulation issued by
              OPM, has the force and effect of law and may not be waived
              or modified by this Office, 5 C.F.R, § 630.306 (1991).
              DECISION

              Dr. James A, Majeski appeals our Claims Group settlementt
              denying his claim to have 91-1/2 hours of forfeited annual
              leave restored to his credit, For the reasons stated below,
              we affirm the Claims Group's settlement,

              Dr. Majeski is a surgeon at the Veterans Administration (VA)
              Hospital in Charleston, South Carolina,   In 1986 ,-the VA
              restored 91-1/2 'hours of annual leave to' Dr. Majeski that
              had been forfeited at the end of the 1985 leave' year,
              However, he did not use the restored leave within the
              required 2-year period, and the leave again was forfeited.

              Dr. Majeski alleges that the VA failed to prop$rly counsel
              him regarding the requirement that the', restoredL leave be
              used within the 2-year period.  He further alleges thatethe
              agency took annual leave used'.during the 2-yeat' period from
              his regular accrued leave instead of the account containing
              his restored leave. In response, the agency notes that when
              Dr. Majeski first sought to have the leave restored in 1985,
              he requested to have it restofed for use in 1986, well
              within the 2-year requirement. The agency, states that the
              leave was restored to a separate account for use within the
              prescribed 2-year period. Further, the agency contends that
              if there was an error regarding the charging of annual
              leave, this would have been reflected on Dr. Majeski's


              'Z-2862430, Nov. 6, 1991./

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most