About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-238189.2 1 (1991-07-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnxm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



         Comzitolier Of nmcml
a the United States

         Decision





         Matter of: Captain Milton D. Beach, USN, Retired--

                      Reconsideration

         File:        B-238189.2

         Date:        July 2',, 1991

         DIGEST

         A payment characterized as a bonus made to a retired member of
         a uniformed service employed by the government which is
         awarded by raising his rate of pay temporarily must be
         included in computing the reduction in retired pay required by
         5 U.S.C. § 5532(c) where cognizant authorities have concluded
         that there is no statutory authority for the payment of
         bonuses and the payment is treated as basic pay for other
         purposes. 69 Comp. Gen. 338 (1990) is overruled.

         DECISION

         This action isK.in response to a.\request from the Financial
         Clerk of the Senate'.for tecon'sideration of our decision
         Catpiin Milton:D. Beach; USN, NRitired, 69 Comp. Gen. 338
         (1990). In that decision we concluded that a payment to a
         retired member efployed in a civilian position by the
         government, characterized as aNbdhus, should not be
         considered in com''ting the reduction'in retired pay required
         by 5 U.S.C. § 5532,(c). As requested, we have reconsidered the
         matter and have concluded that the amount paid in this case
         need not be considered as a bonus in view of the positi6n of
         the Financial Clerk,\ informally concurred in by staff members
         of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, that
         there is no authority to pay a bonus to an employee of the
         Senate. Thus, the additional pay should not be treated as a
         bonus for purposes of dual compensation pay cap calculations.

         In our original decision, we addressed the question of
         whether an amount of money, identified as a bonus, paid to a
         retired service member who is also employed at the U.S.
         Senate should be considered part of the employee's basic pay
         for purposes of calculating reductions in retired pay under
         the Dual Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5532.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most