About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-233041.3 1 (1989-10-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnpw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


S  aN      Comptroller General
           of the United States
           Washington, D.C. 20548
           Decision


           Matter of:     United States Coast Guard--Request for

                             Advance Decision

           File:          B-233041.3
           Date:          October 20, 1989


           DIGEST

           Although contracting agency improperly allowed upward
           correction of bid to include additional profit, bond costs
           and insurance costs when the costs were not adequately
           substantiated, there is no evidence of fraud, bad faith or
           mutual mistake, the resulting contract was not plainly or
           palpably illegal, and the contractor may be paid at the
           contract price where the agency determines that it is not in
           the government's best interest to terminate the contract.


           DECISION

           A United States Coast Guard disbursing officer has requested
           an advance decision regarding the propriety of using funds
           appropriated to the Coast Guard to pay for work completed
           under a contract that we have previously found was awarded
           at an overstated contract price. For the reasons given
           below, we conclude that the contractor may be paid at the
           contract price for work satisfactorily completed.

           This matter arises out of our decision in Lash Corp.,
           68 Comp. Gen. 232 (1989), 89-1 CPD    120. In that decision,
           we denied Lash's protest against the Coast Guard's determi-
           nation to permit upward correction of the bid submitted by
           Construction and Rigging, Inc. (CRI), in response to
           invitation for bids No. DTCG50-88-B-65023, for repair of a
           fuel pier at the Coast Guard Support Center in Kodiak,
           Alaska. Although we denied the protest, we found that the
           $47,393 CRI claimed for additional profit, bond costs and
           insurance costs was not adequately substantiated and that
           the contract price thus should not have included this
           additional amount.

           The Coast Guard considered terminating CRI's contract for
           the convenience of the government based on the overstated
           contract price, but informs us that it has concluded that





                                 ,//( 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most