About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-226888 1 (1988-05-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadncb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

~ ~        The Comptroller General
           of the United States
           Washington, D.C. 20548                                    ,
           Decision



                     Sarah E. Tweedy - Survivor Benefit Plan -
           Matterof- Annuity Reductions Based on Receipt of Veterans
                     Administration Benefits
           File:     B-226888

           Date:      May 18, 1988


           DIGEST

           1. In Croteau v. United States, 823 F.2d 539 (1987),
           the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that
           the widow of two service members was entitled to a full,
           unreduced Survivor Benefit Plan annuity from the Army
           based on her second marriage, even though she was also
           drawing Dependency and Indemnity Compensation from the
           Veterans Administration on the basis of her first marriage.
           We will follow the court's judgment and overrule our prior
           contrary decision in Technical Sergeant John T. Baker, USAF
           (Retired) (Deceased), B-190617, Feb. 16, 1978. Individuals
           similarly situated to the plaintiff in the Croteau litiga-
           tion are entitled to have their annuities adjusted upward
           retroactively, subject to the 6-year statute of limitations
           set out under 31 U.S.C. S 3702(b).

           2. A provision of the laws governing the Survivor Benefit
           Plan, 10 U.S.C. S 1450(b), in certain circumstances requires
           a widow or widower who is eligible for more than one
           annuity, on the basis of more than one marriage, to elect
           which annuity to receive. While the provision uses the term
           elect, its evident purpose is to give the individuals
           covered the highest annuity for which they are eligible.
           Hence, what is involved is not so much a matter of making an
           election as it is of simply determining which annuity
           provides the greatest benefit. There is consequently no
           basis for objection to the retroactive changing of such so-
           called elections, if that change will produce the greatest
           benefit for an annuitant in the retroactive recomputation of
           annuities necessitated by a new interpretation of the law
           under a court judgment.


           DECISION

           The Department of the Army has asked for our decision
           concerning the Survivor Benefit Plan entitlements of
           Mrs. Sarah E. Tweedy, who is the widow of two different




                                      G4a\ 5 5 S S35

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most