About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-215118 1 (1984-12-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmbs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




DECISION


FILE:


MATTER OF:


B-215 118


THE COMPTIROLLIR GRNIERAL
OP THE UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON. 0.C. 20548



      DATE:  December 18, 1984


Claim of Hai Tha Truong


   DIGEST:
         1. A claim which arises from an action taken by the
             Agency for International Development during a
             time of combat, and not from the noncombat
             activities of the United States Armed Forces or
             its members or civilian employees, is not cogniz-
             able under the Military Claims Act, 10 U.S.C.
             S 2733, or the Foreign Claims Act, 10 U.S.C.
             S 2734. However, it would be cognizable under
             GAO's general claims settlement authority,
             31 U.S.C. S 3702, had not the 6 year statute of
             limitations specified in that section run.

         2. The 6-year period of limitations in 31 U.S.C.
             S 3702 was not tolled for the 4 years that
             claimant was living in Socialist Republic of
             Vietnam and may have been prevented from bringing
             suit. Consistent with the Supreme Court's con-
             struction of the Court of Claims 6-year statute
             of limitations, Soriano v. United States,
             352 U.S. 270, 273 (1975), this Office should
             construe the 6-year period of limitation in
             section 3702 strictly.

     The Agency for International Development (AID) asked this
Office for an advance decision about its liability for the
$991,126.50 claim of Mr. Hai Tha Truong, a Vietnamese refu-
gee. Of this amount, only a portion ($53,573.40) represents
losses directly attributable to alleged actions by the United
States. The remainder of the claim is for damages Mr. Truong
suffered when his letter of credit, factory, equipment, and
materials were seized by the Government of Vietnam and he was
forced to pay a fee to leave Vietnam. We do not see any
connection between these consequential losses and the actions
by the United States of which Mr. Truong complains. There-,
fore, we limit our consideration to the first part of the
claim.

     The claim arose from loss of goods carried on two ships,
both of which were diverted from Vietnam because of the Ameri-
can evacuation from that country in April 1975. For the
reasons given below, we find that the claim is barred by the


                         010 9A

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most