About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-214111.2 1 (1984-12-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmbq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                 .*sL9a 1*                               3col
                      0   THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 OECISION               . op THU UNiTE         STATES
               9'WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548




 FILE:     B-214111.2           DATE: :ecember 17, 1934

 MATTER OF:      Dynamic Science, Tnc.--Reconsideration


 DIGEST:

     GAO will deny a request for reconsideration of a
     protest decision based upon a Memorandum Order of
     a United States District Court in a different case
     when the facts of the cases are distinguishable.
     Further, since the court's order is preliminary,
     it would not provide a basis for reconsideration.

     Dynamic Science, Tnc. requests reconsideration of our
decision, Dynamic Science, Inc., B-214111, Oct. 12, 1984,
84-2 C.P.D. % 402. In that decision, we denied Dynamic
Science's protest against the award of a cost-plus-fixed-fee
contract to Rail Company under request for proposals
No. N00019-83-R-0001, issued by the Naval Air Systems
Command. We deny the reauest for reconsideration.

     Dynamic Science bases its request upon a Memorandum
Order issued by the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia in CACI, Inc. v. Tnited States (Civil
Action No. 84-2971, October 16, 1984). Dynamic Science
states that it became aware of the order after reading the
November 5, 1984, issue of Federal Contracts Report, Vol. 42,
No. 18. The firm contends that the order, in which the
court initially found that there was no rational basis for a
cost realism analysis by the Navy, applies directly to its
protest.

     We disagree. First, althouqh both involved cost
realism analyses, the facts in the two cases are
distinguishable. In CACI, after conducting a cost realism
analysis, the agency significantly increased the costs of
one offeror (the plaintiff), as reflected in its best and
final offer, and at the same time, decreased the costs of
its competitor. It then made an award to the latter as the
lowest evaluated offeror. The result was that the actual
contract price, based on the best and final, was approxi-
mately $920,000 more than what the aqency realistically
expected performance to cost.


030gLa

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most