About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-206542.2 1 (1984-09-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmbg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                      THE COMPTROLLER OENURAL
OEC1BION                 O P THE UNITHO      STATUS
                         WASHIN    TON. 0.C. 2054I



FILE:     B-206542.2          DATE: September 5, 1984

MATTER OF: Checker Van Lines-- Request for
                Reconsideration

DIGEST:


      Claimant may not be paid for temporary
      storage of household goods of member of
      Armed Services for a period in excess of 180
      days, in view of illegality of such pay-
      ments, even if claimant's contracts with the
      government did not refer to the regulatory
      180-day limitation and claimant had no
      actual knowledge of it.


      Checker Van Lines requests reconsideration of oyr
 decision Checker Van Lines, B-206542, September 7, 1
 1982, in which we sustained our Claims Group's settle-
 ment of December 4, 1981, disallowing Checker's claim
 for $12,321.50 (Claims Group file No. Z-2834507-0).
 The claim is for charges for thestara*wia.ezcefts af
 180 days of personal property belongtrrg-to-membecs af
 the U.S. Army. We denied the claim becazs'oa1uy-,
 temporary storage of the property was authorized and
 the government's liability for such storage is limited
 by regulation to a period of 180 days, for which the
 claimant has been paid. In addition, we stated that
 although the terms of Checker's contracts with the
 Army were unclear, it appeared to have been the under-
 standing of the parties that storage at government
 expense was limited to 180 days or, at the very least,
 that Checker was aware of the 180-day limitation and
 had agreed to those terms. This conclusion was based
 upon correspondence from Checker to the Army in whic-
 Checker referred to certain shipments as exceeding the
 180 days allotted by expired contract or as left in
 our care beyond the 6-month stipulation of the con-
 tract.

      In its recuest for reconsideration, Checker argues
 that our decision contains an error of fact and an
 error of law. Checker maintains t.hat we erred as a
 factual matter because Checker did not know of, nor


,0(- ltm(

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most